“Reply, bitch!”

To those many few who have initiated communication with me via email, must have had first hand experience of my reluctance to reply. The ‘no-reply’ effect as I like to call it, is quite a common feature, especially to those who have sent me emails on more than a regular basis. I’m here to explain myself.

I’m an email addict, who jumps up in joy no matter how insignificant that email is. As long as there’s a red blip on the Mail icon on my Mac or iPhone, or sometimes even the web on a PC, I get super excited to read what’s in there. I never leave an email unread, never. The problem of course, is in replying. There have been times when I’ve ignored multiple emails from the same party, and they think I’m cross with them. Here’s my explanation: I don’t have one.

When it comes to communication in general, I’m kind of a skunk. I hate to pick up phone calls, many a times ignoring them (and then guarding the landline lest someone else should pick up). It’s not like I don’t have the answers, or am afraid of what awaits me at other end1. Nothing like that. I’m the master of my own life and I care a fuck for what anyone thinks2. I’ve observed my behaviour—almost an out of body experience—and I’ve noticed that it’s a sort of unwillingness to succumb to someone else’s will of making me do something that I didn’t want to in the first place. It’s either that, or I’m a pussy.

I understand that the day I signed up for an email address, or got a phone number, I signed the unwritten agreement to respond to any incoming communication. The rule states that if I’m cool with the person, I have the time, and the answers, even if it’s an “I don’t know”, I need to send back that communication. This rule of course carries over from our offline conversations, the one we have in our day to day lives. Unfortunately, electronic communication has its faults in the indirect way it presents itself. If someone asks me a question point blank standing right in front of me, I can reply. If someone asks me a question on the phone (after me having picked it up mistakenly), I can reply. If someone gets me on IM, I can reply. But email, an incoming call, incoming chat, or what have you, are all indirect forms of communication, where if I don’t respond to the communication, it’s not yet acknowledged, and I’m off the hook. That’s my lazy explanation to it at least.

So the next time you send me an email (which by the way is still the best way to get in touch with me), and I don’t reply, please don’t take it out on your dog. I don’t usually like dogs, but whacking them for when it’s not their fault is not something I you should be doing. *kicks dog for no reason*. Instead, know that I’ve read your email, silently acknowledged it, and am on my way to acting upon it (if I have chosen to do so). There are of course exceptions to this, and that’s usually when I just don’t like you.

1. If you can believe that load of shit.
2. Still believing, aren’t you?

Where Atheism is the right move

The world of religion clouds the mind of our youth, and it’s up to me to solve the riddles of life, answer the unanswered questions of the universe, and mock one of my good friends in the closing paragraph.

Early this morning, Aayush decided to share his theory on creationism, family history, and how God has a part to play in the tying of a cat to a pillar. His hypothesis:

Praying to God to get your wishes fulfilled was invented because that’s the only way you could get the ordinary unwashed masses to meditate, an activity which has actual scientifically proven benefits today; old Hindu saints preached that the cow was a sacred animal and that keeping one in the house as a pet would get you to heaven (and killing it would reserve you a seat in hell) because they knew how essential milk was for our health and wanted to ensure that we would have a constant supply of it. […]

The forebears of human civilisation realised that they needed to incentivise doing the everyday good deeds as well and make people fear doing anything wrong and that’s why they invented God. For that reason, I believe in God, even though I don’t.

Since Aayush went ahead and shared an anecdote to illustrate his point, I’ve decided to go ahead with one, too. I have a lot of vivid dreams during my REMs. Sometimes it’s an action sequence, sometimes it’s horror, and sometimes I’m about to get lucky with Carmen Electra. I mention ‘about to’, because some assturd will wake me up just as the good stuff is about to begin. As soon consciousness takes over, the dream starts fading, and I don’t want that to happen. I quickly shut my eyes, and try to get back into that dream. I try to dream of Carmen again, about how my hands were about to discover the plastic in her chest, but she’s fading away. Everything is slowly turning to reality. The pillow now feels like a pillow, and the simulated perfume no longer exists. I will never have Carmen.

Now whether you like Carmen Electra or not, is a different matter. I have my days; but mostly, I do. That’s besides the point. The point—hypothesis, as Aayush says— is that once you know, you know. There’s no turning back. You can’t dumb yourself down, because let’s admit is, religion is all about dumbing you down. The problem with Aayush’s convoluted mess of a hypothesis, is he confuses God, with religion. God doesn’t exist. End of story. You know it, I know it he knows it. If that’s the case, you’re an atheist, and I’m an atheist; there’s no argument beyond that. Unless, of course, you do believe in God, in which case you should probably stop reading this blog, rethink your beliefs, or just sit quiet in the corner—grown ups are talking.

Religion is culture, with God thrown in just to fuck with people. Aayush is right on many counts, on how many of the religious practices came into being. Whether they are good practices or bad, that’s a whole new argument. But he confuses religion with God. There’s two things about religion that one can be absolutely sure of is thats (a) it’s man-made, and (b) is heavily evolved. Religion of the cave men is different from the religion of the Rishis a few thousand years ago, to the religion of modern day god worshippers. You can single out a few instances where practices in today’s religions have real world benefits, but collectively it’s a waste of time, and mostly detrimental.

A little about my religious beliefs. I’m a Christian. I was born into a Roman Catholic family, and I went was forced to go to church till the age of 18. I’m essentially a Christian Atheist. But I respect other people’s I celebrate Christmas, enjoy village feasts of Saints (the food part of it at least), Easter, San Joao, all that. I even celebrate Hindu festivals with my neighbours. I do not have any Muslim friends though, sadly. To me, religion is about celebrating culture, about taking days off from your regular work-life, about your relatives and friends coming together, communicating. These are important social interactions for healthy human living, and I enjoy them. I do not however waste my time at sunday church, nor do I sit around chanting the rosary, nor do I write letters to the Pope. I am, in my beliefs, and actions, an atheist.

But atheists are not just non-believers. They’re people who think for themselves. Once you remove God and religious doctrines, you have to make up your own. Every decision is your own, and you are aware of it. An atheist understands—or at least tries to understand—the thresholds of what’s good and fun, and what’s detrimental, causes harm, or is just plain fucking stupid. ‘Make up your mind’ doesn’t mean violent, uncultured, anarchic or stupid. Atheists don’t around slaughtering cows, eating unhealthy foods, or refuse to eat neem leaves, any more so than they would if they were followers of a religion. An atheist understands the reasons behind any religious practice, and practices them because of that understanding.

Thankfully, modern civilisation and things-to-do-other-than-god-stuff is bringing about a change in thinking, with a lot more atheists roaming free on this planet. This is a good thing, for the points illustrated above. Aayush isn’t exactly wrong, but he isn’t right either. First of all, I think he’s got his concepts about Agnosticism wrong. He’s clearly an atheist, so we’re off on a good start. His folly is he wants to blindly follow religion because he assumes it’s good for him; and that’s an irresponsible decision. He quotes neem and meditation, and while those are acceptable religious practices, we’ve seen a lot of them which are detrimental to humanity. Besides, religion is not even required to perform them. As we have seen, you can meditate without praying to a God, you can have neem leaves without a morning sacrifice, and humanely rear cows without considering them to be gods.

“A couple of [extra] buttons [on the iPhone] that can be mapped to third-party apps or any feature in a third-party app (like creating a tweet in Tweetie).” — Aayush Arya

But let’s excuse Aayush this once. I have a feeling the Hawas got to him which resulted in his thought-compass going haywire. I mean, on this very same day the idiot actually wanted the iPhone to have an extra button, that would serve functions like creating new tweets. Oh Aayush, get well soon.

[To note: A German Nazi helped me collect my thoughts.]

It’s time to rethink the design of a blog

It’s time for Preacher Milind to take the podium, and spread the word of Good. You may please be seated; hold your insults until you’ve reached the finger.

When the internet came along, every two bit designer wanted every new feature on their site. DHTML? Fuck yeah DHTML I want some of that shit. Gimme some of that javascript. Fuck yeah. Check out my Geocities page, and sign my guestbook. Then came along Blogger, Wordpress, and now people have taken to Tumblr as the next blogging platform. Tumblr does have its downsides, and Wordpress still is the biggest CMS on the interwebs. Its use scales from a small blog, to a full blown website. This is made possible by the thousands of features it ships with, along with thousand other plugins you can install. What this results in, is an explosion of power, that’s extremely easy to wield.

If there’s any indicator of where design is going to be, it’s the Mac community. Developers and designers are the first ones to display the future of design, and what they’re all talking about now, is minimalism. The future of design is not in the designer’s ability to incorporate features, rather, it’s their ability to remove features. It’s not about adding what’s important; it’s about throwing out what’s not important. Tumblr has got a lot of things right with its themes. They’re simple, focus on the content, and are perfect for personal blogs. But, Tumblr lacks in features and making your own theme can be quite a pain, which is why I’ve stuck to Wordpress.

First impressions were good, but I quickly realised it was made very inefficient use of pixels. Considering I wanted to post larger images, I knew this one wouldn’t last long.

A while ago someone asked me to do a piece on how I redesigned this blog—speaking about my previous design. I don’t think the sh.it was my ultimate design, in that I still found some glaring errors in it presented (hence the new design). But I did do some things right that time. I totally obliterated categories and tags. Understanding your content and audience is key to any design. The sh.it is a narrative, so there’s absolutely no need for categories or tags—anywhere. Even if your blog does have varied sortable content, with a readership that would sift through it, placement of tags makes a huge difference. They’re useless on the home page, but for individual articles it makes sense to have them running along the footer, defining the article and encouraging further exploration. Some argue that it defines the content. I’d say it’s meaningless clutter. Categories on the other hand help sort content. Unlike tags, it’s not so easy to create a new category, at least mentally, so they stay organised.

I haven’t checked the stats for effectiveness, but these category listings are certainly more clickable than a straight up list. Gorgeous icons from Glyphish.

When we redesigned Beautiful Pixels, one of the things we changed was instead of automatically generating categories listing, we decided to go with a static list—a list of icons it was. The point is that we already know the type of content we’re producing, and having categories like “Misc” just don’t help in navigation. Nobody in their right minds would ever click on the Misc category in a list. Even when defining categories, we’ve trimmed down on SA by about 50%. The result is a much more focussed list—although still not focussed enough. The thing about categories and tags, is that they make sense to you, but not to your reader. Put yourself in the reader’s shoes. When was the last time you navigated using categories? Instead of categories, how about a list of featured articles. Your best work will obviously attract more clicks. And your goal is to enable readers to find your best work.

Search is another thing a lot of people give a lot of importance to. I for one can’t remember the last time I searched for something on a blog. This is mostly because Wordpress search is a fucking turd, but even otherwise, I think Google.com is a better way to search for content. This is especially true of personal blogs, like this one. But a search bar is important. You’d want to enable your readers to be able to find articles they might have read in the past. I took my search bar, and shoved it right at the bottom. Unless you need it, it’s not there.

One thing you need to pay close attention to, is link dilution. There’s always a treshhold after which links do not make any sense. Having fifty recommendations in your blogroll leads to not one of them getting clicked. Inversely, you can’t have just one link. You can’t have two. Isolate what’s most important, most common to your kind of content, and recommend it. Again, decide whether you even need to have a cloud of links pointing to other peoples’ sites. More often than not, you don’t need to.

I didn’t want to be very specific about what you should do or should not do. It all depends on the content, and the audience. If your readers are largely IE6 users, god bless your soul. For the new design, I’ve used web fonts with CSS @font-face; the titles and sub-text treated with Yanone Kaffesatz. I wish I had used some Ajax or CSS animations, but apart from pop ups for the thumbs above, it just didn’t make sense.

On the flip side, I’m not using my old theme anymore. If anyone wants it, you can have it. Mind you, it’s broken, and hard coded, and I wouldn’t recommend it.

I hope you like the new look of the sh.it. I think it combines good typography, whitespace, and the ability to present large images without ruining the design. The general look is inspired by Made by Sofa’s redesign, which is one hell of a job by Jorn van Dijk. I did not work very hard on this one, though. It’s been minimally tested to work right in Safari and other webkit browsers; it should work in Firefox; Internet Explorer users can suck my brother’s dog’s loose balls. Big thanks to Ole Teucher for his invaluable feedback. If you’re ever on the lookout for a nazi of any kind, they don’t make em better than the Germans. I’m sure there’s a bunch of things broken; I don’t want to hear about them. Also, I don’t think I’ll ever go back and fix my earlier articles, which now feature a warped look. My excuse is that I’m looking forward.

As always, thanks for stopping by.

“Save the Tiger”—yet another bullshit story in the making

Every few years, some company starts a [selfish] ad campaign to save the tiger, and everyone follows along. The latest is Aircel, who is busy counting down to the last tiger as if it were New Year’s night. There are some 1400 odd tigers alive they say, and the numbers are rapidly decreasing.
I obviously have [...]

Every few years, some company starts a [selfish] ad campaign to save the tiger, and everyone follows along. The latest is Aircel, who is busy counting down to the last tiger as if it were New Year’s night. There are some 1400 odd tigers alive they say, and the numbers are rapidly decreasing.

I obviously have a problem with this.

Let me start by saying I’m not against tigers. I think they should be protected, and allowed to regenerate their population. I’m not against killing anything—except bloodsucking mosquitos and maybe our three dogs—so tigers are safe. In fact, I’ve always wanted a Tiger as a pet cat; where even an extremely large house cat would do. But, I have a problem with this largely fake sympathy toward Tigers.

Tigers and other carnivores are ecologically redundant. Their purpose in nature was to make sure the herbivores don’t eat up all of the grass, thereby leaving the earth barren; ending life. Now, humans are very well capable of doing that job—trigger happy Salman is just waiting to shoot down some black buck—so where does the Tiger fit in? The Tiger is only for the saving. The vanishing of the glamorous cat puts us all in extreme guilt for our better lives, so we want to do something about it. Nature doesn’t give a shit about Tigers. Nature doesn’t need tigers. Existence is not depending on whether or not tigers roam this planet. What are we saving them for. Our children? Aside from knowing that there are tigers in the wild, when was the last time you ever saw one? I’m not counting zoos here. And if you did make a Safari trip, how do you feel about yourself, disturbing their lives with your fucking cameras and littering?

What a magnificent beast, right? (via Flickr)

Say something against Tigers, and it won’t be a second before someone yells out, “what a fucking self-important self-riteous selfish ass-tard”. Which is what I am. All individuals are selfish. It starts at the individual level, them family, local society, country, and finally, the species. With animals on the other hand it’s much simpler. In many cases it’s a direct jump from individual to species. Sometimes not even species. My point is we’re all selfish, so it’s not wrong to think of our species first.

Let me get the trivial stuff out of the way. We have no reason to kill tigers. Poaching is just plain wrong, and people who own tiger skin should be hanged at the local beat show. But that’s not why Tigers are disappearing—rather, they’re not proliferating. It’s because of drying watering holes, lack of prey, receding forest cover, and things like that which lead to the Tiger crossing paths with a human. Should we do something about it? What can we do about it? Not much. No matter how many speeches and documentaries we watch, we continue to use motor vehicles, we continue to eat chicken and beef, we continue to live in concrete houses, and continue to breed. As long as there’s development, there will be a climb. The climb may show a steady decline in increase, but it’s increasing nonetheless. Selfish species for sure, but evolution taught us that. It’s nature’s mistake really. It made man so powerful and smart, that he has taken over the planet. I’d like to blame this God fellow, but I’ll leave him alone for a change. But then, the age old philosophical question is asked again, “what are we here for?”. We don’t know. Intelligence, collective consciousness, and documented history could be far greater evolutionary achievements on nature’s part, than something as minor as a four legged carnivore.

So what do we do then? Just stand by and watch? No way. Do something. My parents are one of India’s greatest environmentalists (please don’t tell them I said that), and have played a crucial role in saving Goa from destruction. Truth. My brother is one of the most knowledgeable natural scientists I know, and has been educating people about the harmlessness of snakes for several years now (don’t tell that asswipe I said this either). I have reared the most awesome cat in the world. He’s been bred to be soft, sissy, good looking, and a good internet marketeer apparently. Do something for sure, something selfless that will prolong the life of this planet as we know it.

The problem with this “Save the Tiger” bullshit, is that it makes you feel like you’re doing something by not doing anything. As long as you don’t kill any tigers, and maybe have your kid draw some shitty paintings of happy tigers, you’ve done your job. It’s as fake as using a fleshlight to jerk yourself off. The real problems are swept under the rug, because (a), they’re not glamorous enough to sell a story to the public, and (b), it requires major effort and lifestyle changes on part of the public. The Ganges has turned into one filthy flow of sewage, the mountains are being hacked by people who can afford to pay bribes; we’re not worried about frogs killed for their legs, or indigenous primitive trees being hacked to make way for teak and other desirable wood, or that forest mushrooms hardly grow these days. Our priority should be to create a sustainable environment for the natural ecosystem to thrive. We need cleaner sources of energy, better laws and administration at from our government, and we need to understand that the last link of the chain is not nearly as important as the first. Make that happen, and tigers will most certainly take care of themselves.

natural-tiger
A rare red and white tiger, spotted in its natural habitat.

Twitter lessons for the dumb and stupid—you.

I know. I know. There are way too many of these ‘how to tweet responsibly’ articles out there. Mine isn’t going to change a thing.
Fact is, I needed to explain all this to a friend of mine who recently joined twitter (and is making an ass out of himself), so why not put it in [...]

I know. I know. There are way too many of these ‘how to tweet responsibly’ articles out there. Mine isn’t going to change a thing.

Fact is, I needed to explain all this to a friend of mine who recently joined twitter (and is making an ass out of himself), so why not put it in words. There’s a shit load of Don’t in here, so if all you’re going to do is point out the negativity, I advise you to bend over and stick a carrot through the hole facing the sky. On to twitter…

Retweet Responsibly.

retweet

People don’t know how to retweet. You may say, just use the twitter retweets feature, which is fine for some cases. But other times you want to own that piece of news, so you retweet traditionally. Here’s the syntax.

If it’s a piece of news, send out the news first, then add a slasher “/via” followed by @whoever. So, “Michael Jackson has risen again! http://link.me/xhs5y /via @jerkoff” is the right way to go. Always put the content first, and then the credits. Why is it important who you or your followers who you got the information from? But you do want to credit the source, so the via link is apt. RT is just in bad taste.

But what about if there already is a “via @firstperson” in that tweet? I’ve seen so many cases of “RT @someone Here comes the news http://link.me/sexdoll /via @else”. Please don’t treat your followers like shit. In most cases, I’d say give credit only to the person you got the retweet from, not the original source. If you do want to give credit to two sources (never more than two though), add use the slasher and tack em on, like “/via @dumbass @goobimama”.

Sometimes, an ultimate original source will tweet a link. Like for instance, TUAW tweets a link to one of their articles. If that’s the case, you don’t need to add the “via”, because you’ve already credited the source with that link. I would recommend that you change the words though, so it’s more personal.

When it comes to quotes and funnies, instead of using the RT syntax, append the Twitter handle at the end of the tweet using a hyphen. “I vote for world peace — @brandonpittman” is way better than using via or RT. Although, I’d say funnies belong to the original author, so it’s best you just use the new retweet feature.

Avoid Twitlonger

I’ve seen so many people make me hit the unfollow button because they were too lazy to edit their tweet. If the tweet is over 140 characters, don’t tweet it. Just don’t.

The only time Twitlonger is appreciated, is when replying to someone and the answer is too long to be covered in two tweets. It should be at least more than 300 characters to make any sense. For the rest, take heed to Aayush’s advice on cramming your tweets into the 140 character space.

Don’t use hashtags unless you know what the fuck you’re doing

“This #ipad makes you look #cool. #mac #apple” in fact makes you look stupid. Hashtags serve two purposes: to add a tag categorizing a tweet which otherwise doesn’t contain that tag “I’m leaving now! #pakapukutweetup” would being all tweets related to Paka Puku tweetup together. They don’t work for broader untracked subjects—things like Apple or #India. The other use, is sarcasm, satire, and humor. as Patrick does it.

“I feel sorry for the little girl who raped. #notreally”.

You’re not stupid, are you? No wait, don’t answer that.

Follow Friday

I get the idea behind follow Friday. It’s about recommending your favourite twitterrers so others can enjoy their tweets too. What I don’t get however, is this large scale back scratching that goes on every Friday. I’m even willing to entertain a meaningless tweet with a bunch of people thrown in tagged with #FF, but when I see more than one in a row, I immediately unfollow. There’s absolutely no excuse for that kind of rubbish.

backscratching

For what exactly are you trying to achieve with a #followfriday? I can bet you not one of your followers will follow someone from an #FF tweet. I don’t, and I don’t even get new followers from such tweets. It doesn’t work. The only way you can truly recommend someone, is by sending out a single tweet explaining why you think that person is great.

Don’t use yFrog

Use Img.ly, or Droplr, or Cloud (if you have an invite), or even trusty old TwitPic. yFrog is the ugliest image host you could find, and I despise even seeing the link in my timeline. Curse @Tweetie for defaulting to yFrog, which inadvertently leads to me sending out a yFrog link once every few. Using a better host not only reduces clutter, it also makes your images look better. I say Img.ly, because not only is it the best looking one out there, they’re also the most innovative of the lot.

Don’t ever fuck with my timeline

Whenever you’re going to do something, know that it’s stupid, because that’s what you’re good at. So take a step back for a moment, and think about me for a change. Will I benefit from seeing those >140 characters? More often than not, it’s going to be a big no. Do I think I’m as stupid as you to believe I’ll win a MacBook Pro by tweeting about it? Do you really think I’m interested in seeing pictures of your cat? Of course, your timeline belongs to you, and you should post whatever the fuck you feel like. Just don’t overdo it, because you know, the big bad wolf has a habit of dropping in unexpectedly.